So what’s left for the West? They can never admit to their populations that the sanctions on Russia are fruitless and mainly harm their own people, because that is what happened: prices in Europe have risen dramatically and many sectors cannot export their products to Russia anymore.

Seeing as how one of the motivations behind Russia’s special operation in Ukraine is to fight against the growing fascist threat on its borders, there’s no way that anyone in its society could ever in good conscience tolerate Krasovsky’s anti-Ukrainian hate speech that’s no different in essence from the same anti-Russian hate speech spewed by Kiev’s top representatives.

This famous journalist’s suspicious death in Kenya by a sniper shot to the head, which came shortly after he announced the upcoming release of an anti-corruption documentary exposing his country's US-backed post-modern coup regime, might prove to be a tipping point in Pakistan’s political crisis.

The supreme irony is that Kiev’s representatives spew ethno-nationalist hate speech against Russians in Ukraine while simultaneously stoking similar such ethno-nationalist hatred against their own refugees in Europe through the dog whistles that they just blew by fearmongering about them. This Machiavellian weaponization of hate speech proves that they’re not below putting their most desperate citizens in danger abroad in order to get what they demand for beating Russia at home.

As a matter of fact, it has to be stressed that the Ukrainian historiography of their own history of the land and the people is extremely nationalistic and in very cases not objective like many other national historiographies. It is basically politically colored with the main task to present the Ukrainians as a natural ethnolinguistic nation who have been historically fighting to create a united independent national state and unjustifiably claiming certain territories to be ethnohistorical the “Ukrainian”.

The supreme irony is that Kiev’s representatives spew ethno-nationalist hate speech against Russians in Ukraine while simultaneously stoking similar such ethno-nationalist hatred against their own refugees in Europe through the dog whistles that they just blew by fearmongering about them. This Machiavellian weaponization of hate speech proves that they’re not below putting their most desperate citizens in danger abroad in order to get what they demand for beating Russia at home.

Lula's election represents respect for the rule of law, democracy, and a new era of prosperity for Brazil and the world, with Brazil acting importantly in the Construction of a Multipolar World, with respect to the existence of peoples, internal markets, and a world with fewer social inequalities.

It's unimportant to its representatives that Ozhelskiy’s father was born in what’s nowadays Western Ukraine nor that his son considers himself Ukrainian and even participated in multiple rallies against his own country. Kiev will always consider that young man to be Russian, their attitude towards which can be described as ”Russo-contempt” or “Russo-odiousness” in the infamous words of Verkhovna Rada Chairman Ruslan Stefanchuk that he recently shared on Twitter.

Israel will present this as a “proxy attack” against a so-called “Russian ally” while Russia will present it as the “successful defense” of that selfsame “ally”. Even though the attack didn’t make any difference, it’ll still tickle the imagination of each side and reinforce their self-serving but false “rivalry” narrative.

Those who claim to #StandWithUkraine aren’t “defending the free world from authoritarian terror”, “safeguarding the rules-based order”, or “protecting everyone’s human rights”, but “normalizing” anti-minority hate speech that'll inevitably widen to include Black & Brown folks, homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, and other minorities residing within the US-led West's Golden Billion.